![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Justice's
Klein Still Open on Microsoft Remedy
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top Justice Department official
Wednesday declined to rule out seeking a breakup of Microsoft Corp. (NasdaqNM:MSFT
- news) as a remedy in
the Microsoft antitrust case, saying he was keeping all options open.
``We are considering a variety of options,'' Justice
Department antitrust chief Joel Klein told reporters when asked about a
published report that the federal government and 19 states, that brought
the case, were leaning away from any breakup of the software giant.
``Other people may try to speculate ... may try to spin
us ... may try to lean,'' he said after testifying to the House Judiciary
Committee on antitrust enforcement oversight.
District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled April
3 that Microsoft had broken U.S. antitrust laws by abusing its monopoly in
personal computer operating systems to harm consumers and other companies.
Jackson has set a May 24 hearing on appropriate
penalties and asked the government side to present its proposed remedies
by April 28 at the latest.
``We are going to do our job,'' Klein said.
A report in Wednesday's Washington Post said lawyers for
the Justice Department and 19 states were leaning against asking for a
breakup of Microsoft to prevent any future antitrust abuses.
But the newspaper, citing sources, added that the debate
was fluid enough that the decision could go either way.
An alternative to breaking up Microsoft, that government
attorneys could seek, would be to impose restrictions on its business
conduct. Industry experts have suggested it might be asked to freely
distribute the inner workings of its Windows operating software or be
required to charge uniform prices to computer makers.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||